Presentations+by+ST

= = =Faculty seminar, 2 hours=
 * Date**: Wed 5 Oct
 * Time**: errrmmm... remind me, Philip.
 * Venue**: 5B85?

Pre-session stuff

 * Advertising**
 * ACTION: PR
 * Let's include the ACT ed design community on our list of invitees. Meg can distribute, no worries.


 * Provocations**
 * Let's brainstorm some of these for the session itself.
 * ACTION: At the pre-session prep meeting

Schedule/program

 * **Time** || **Item** || **Notes** || **Presenter** ||
 * h0:05 || Introduction || * Overview
 * Changes made || SS? ||
 * || Wiki and web stuff || * What it was
 * Why we chose it
 * How it worked
 * Advantages/disadvantages
 * Other web stuff: risk management, blogs, Ning || MP ||
 * || Philosophy of the GDSE || * errrr ... we rock?
 * //Formidabilis// //sumus//? || ? ||
 * || Strike Team approach || * Power of a small team
 * Coherence for students
 * Advantages for moderation, support || KH? ||
 * || Feedback || * We got it
 * Wot it sed || PR ||
 * || Assessment || * This will be the 'guts' of the session
 * This is what we dun and why (give outline from sem 1 and 2 -- integrated and non-integrated tasks)
 * Value of integrated assessment -- students working at higher levels with pedagogical reasoning
 * Things getting moderated to hell. yay.
 * Marking creative responses
 * Issues/problems
 * But the main bit ... give us your ideas/questions/critiques ||  ||